CASE REPORT


Multi-modal Imaging in Etanercept-induced Uveitis: A Case Series



Jaidip Gill1, *, Robert Barry1, Shreekanth Sreekantam1, Bashar Mohammed1
1 Birmingham and Midlands Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1876
Abstract HTML Views: 1071
PDF Downloads: 676
Total Views/Downloads: 3623
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 801
Abstract HTML Views: 492
PDF Downloads: 418
Total Views/Downloads: 1711



Creative Commons License
© 2020 Gill et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Birmingham and Midlands Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, United Kingdom; Tel: 07960220702; E-mail: jaigil@gmail.com


Abstract

Introduction:

To report with multi-modal imaging the clinical course of 3 patients with new-onset uveitis following treatment with etanercept.

Methods:

Retrospective case-note reviews were conducted of 3 patients previously established on etanercept who developed new-onset acute uveitis.

Results and Discussion:

Three patients were assessed with a mean age of 44.3 (43-47). Etanercept was indicated for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in two patients and psoriatic arthritis in 1 patient. Duration of etanercept treatment ranged from 7 to 10 years; however, in two cases, treatment recently changed to an etanercept biosimilar agent. Two patients were diagnosed with bilateral panuveitis and one patient had chronic relapsing anterior uveitis. Infection screen was negative in all three patients. 2 patients developed cystoid macular oedema as viewed on Spectral Domain OCT. Fundus fluorescein angiography was performed in one patient who demonstrated bilateral retinal vasculitis. All three patients were started on systemic and topical treatment. One patient received sub-tenon triamcinolone injection. Etanercept was discontinued for all patients. 1 of 3 patients lost vision at 7 months. 2 patients demonstrated long-term remission and one patient required intravitreal steroid implantation to stabilize an ongoing intraocular inflammation. Two patients who had complete remission were commenced on Adalimumab while the third patient was commenced on Secukinumab.

Conclusion:

The clinical course of uveitis developing paradoxically following etanercept treatment is variable. Multi-modal imaging is useful for the clinician that helps in diagnosing and monitoring associated macular oedema and retinal ischaemia. Cessation of etanercept and systemic corticosteroid treatment are often required to prevent ocular morbidity.

Keywords: Etanercept, Uveitis, Paradoxical adverse effects, Multi-modal imaging, Ocular inflammation, Ocular morbidity.