Associations between Retinal and Choroidal Vascularization Parameters and Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation in Type 2 Diabetes and Healthy Controls

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Associations between Retinal and Choroidal Vascularization Parameters and Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation in Type 2 Diabetes and Healthy Controls

The Open Ophthalmology Journal 21 Nov 2024 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/0118743641339896241011050521

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) are a group at an increased cardiovascular risk, which is associated with impaired vascular endothelial function. The aim of our study was to determine whether retinal and choroidal vascularization parameters are related to vascular endothelial function as expressed by flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD).

Methods

Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients were included in this observational study; 15 eyes were categorized into the study group, defined as type 2 diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy and other diabetic complications, and 17 in the healthy control group. RTVue XR Avanti optical coherent tomography angiography (angio-OCT) was used to perform OCT scans and visualize the superficial and deep retinal plexus (SCP and DCP, respectively). Using OCT image binarization, the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) was calculated. Brachial FMD was measured for each participant.

Results

There was no difference in FMD between the DM group and healthy controls (6.64 vs 5.67, p= 0.47, respectively). A positive correlation of FMD was found with the perifoveal SCP and CVI (r=0.57 and r=0.58, respectively) in the control group and with perifoveal DCP in the study group, control group, and the whole studied population (r=0.58, r=0.89, and r=0.68, respectively). In multivariate linear regression, after adjusting for age and sex, FMD was associated with the presence of hypertension (b=-0.4) and perifoveal DCP (b=0.47).

Conclusion

Retinal capillary plexus density parameters are positively associated with peripheral vascular endothelial function expressed by FMD in type 2 diabetes and healthy populations.

Keywords: Flow-mediated vasodilatation, FMD, Choroidal vascularity index, CVI, Retinal capillary plexus, Peripheral vascular endothelial.

1. INTRODUCTION

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) has a significant impact on the eye, as diabetic retinopathy is one of the leading causes of preventable vision loss [1]. One of the primary tissues affected by diabetes is the vascular endothelium, a layer of specialized cells lining the interior surface of blood vessels. This tissue plays a crucial role in various functions, including hemostasis, inflammation modulation, vaso- constriction, and vasodilation [2]. It is suggested that damage to the vascular endothelium is critical in the development of diabetic retinopathy and that such damage also affects the choroid [3, 4].

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) is a non-invasive examination that enables the visualization of the superficial and deep retinal capillary plexus vascular densities (SCP and DCP, respectively). These vessels consist of a single layer of endothelial cells, along with pericytes and a basement membrane [5]. Visualizing the choroidal vasculature is more challenging, although it may be assessed using the Choroidal Vascularity Index (CVI), as proposed by Agrawal et al. [6].

Vascular endothelial function is also impaired in cardiovascular disease. Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) is widely used to assess endothelial function in peripheral arteries [7]. This phenomenon describes the vasodilation of an artery in response to increased blood flow, such as after a period of ischemia. Studies have reported that FMD of the brachial artery is an indicator of cardio- vascular risk [8].

One of the main factors contributing to FMD is the release of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO). It has been shown that NO modulates basal flow through the retinal and choroidal vasculature and influences the response of other vasodilatory factors, such as bradykinin, acetylcholine, and histamine [9]. Ocular hemodynamics is impaired by endothelial dysfunction because it increases the synthesis of reactive oxygen species and decreases the absorption of NO [10]. FMD has previously been studied in regard to the retinal and choroidal diseases. It has been found to be decreased in advanced diabetic retinopathy and wet age-related macular degeneration [11, 12]. These findings suggest that peripheral endothelial function measured by FMD may influence the ocular vascular system.

Identifying ophthalmic equivalents of FMD could facilitate the detection of patients with potentially increased cardiovascular risk and enhance our under- standing of the pathophysiology of diabetic eye disease. This is particularly important because the diabetic population is already at an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease, which is further exacerbated by the presence of diabetic retinopathy [13]. To the best of our knowledge, it has not yet been determined whether vascular endothelial function, as expressed by FMD, translates into retinal and choroidal vascular status in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The aim of our study is to identify which ocular vascularisation parameters (SCP, DCP, or CVI) may be related to vascular endothelial function in the peripheral circulation, expressed by FMD, in type 2 diabetic patients and healthy population.

2. METHODS

This observational study included patients with type 2 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy and healthy controls. Exclusion criteria included type 1 diabetes, age under 18 years, intraocular pressure over 21 mmHg, previous ocular treatments, retinal diseases, ocular diseases that may occlude the visual axis (corneal opacities, cataract), systemic diseases other than diabetes and hypertension (HT). Data on HbA1C levels and hypertension history were collected.

Comprehensive ophthalmological examinations were conducted for each patient, which involved slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment and fundus, best-corrected visual acuity assessment using a Snellen chart (maximum limit of 1.0), axial length measurement (ARGOS biometer, Alcon, Switzerland), and air-puff intraocular pressure measurement (TRK-2p, Topcon, Japan). Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and angio-OCT scans of the macula (3 × 3 mm) were taken using the RTVue XR Avanti (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA). SCP and DCP were calculated using built-in software. Only the eye with the better image quality in the angio-OCT scans was selected for analysis in each participant. All measurements were performed under consistent room lighting conditions in the evening.

The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Wroclaw Medical University, Poland (KB-510/2022). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

2.1. Flow-mediated Vasodilatation Measurement

Subjects were asked not to eat and avoid exercise, caffeine, and alcohol for 6 hours before the measurement. The test was performed in a quiet, darkened room at the same time of the day for each patient in the evening. FMD was measured in the supine position. The upper limb was rested on a gutter foam, supported on a table to be at the height of the patient's heart. First, systolic and diastolic pressures were measured, and after 10 minutes, a 5-second longitudinal recording of the brachial artery was made. The measurement was performed using a linear B-mode 4-13 MhZ linear probe ultrasound machine Aloka prosound a6 (Aloka Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The correct location of the artery was confirmed using Doppler pulse wave analysis. The cuff placed on the forearm was then inflated to a value at least 50 mmHg greater than the previously measured systolic pressure. After 5 minutes, the cuff was released, and the brachial artery was re-measured 2 minutes after cuff deflation. All measurements were taken by the same investigator.

Each measurement image quality was assessed, and a peak diameter frame with clear vessel wall boundaries was included in the analysis. The arterial diameter was measured using ImageJ (1.54G, Wayne Rasband, NIH, USA, Available at http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/docs/index.html) and the publicly available macro InteredgeDistance. Image analysis was performed by the same blinded investigator. FMD was calculated using the formula: FMD = [(maximum diameter - baseline diameter)/ baseline diameter] × 100 (%).

The accuracy and reproducibility of FMD measure- ments in this study were ensured by adhering to a standardized protocol described above. All FMD assess- ments were performed by a single trained operator, minimizing inter-operator variability. All patients were measured under consistent conditions to control for environmental and physiological factors that might affect FMD outcomes.

2.2. Choroidal Parameters Calculation

Using MATLAB (R2018a, MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA), we analyzed raw OCT files, focusing on the 3 × 3 mm area centered on the fovea. Each scan was used to create a 3D model of the choroidal space centered on the macula, with the ETDRS chart overlaid on the choroid. Choroidal thickness (CT), measured from Bruch’s membrane to the choroidoscleral junction (CSJ), was determined using an automated method that evaluates the CSJ type and visibility of ciliary vessels. Artificial intelligence/ machine learning libraries containing characteristics of CSJ types, visibility, and ciliary vessel locations ensured the reproducibility of the CSJ line. The OCT scans were converted from grayscale to binary images to determine the luminal area (LA), defined as the area of dark pixels, and the total choroidal area (TCA). The choroidal vascularity index (CVI) was then calculated using the formula: CVI = LA/TCA.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The normality of the data distribution was evaluated using the Lilliefors test. For intergroup comparisons, the Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables without a normal distribution, while the Student's t-test was applied for variables with a normal distribution and equal variances tested by Levene’s test. Spearman correlation was used to analyze how clinical and vascularization parameters affect FMD in the DM group, control group, and total population. Univariate linear regression was performed with FMD as the dependent variable and clinical and vascularization parameters as independent variables. Following this, multivariate linear regression was conducted, including all parameters that were statistically significant (p < 0.1) in the univariate regression, as well as age and sex, regardless of their significance in the univariate analysis. Categorical variables were assigned binary values and underwent sigma-restricted parameterisation. Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistica Software version 13.3 (TIBCO Statistica 1984-2017, TIBCO Software Inc.). Data in tables and figures are presented as mean. In the cases of missing data, the participant was omitted from the analysis.

The central region (-C) was defined as a 1.0 mm diameter circle around the fovea, while the parafoveal (-P) area was described by extending 2.0 mm around the central region. The values for SCP, DCP, CT, and CVI within the parafoveal quadrants were averaged, and only the eye with the better image quality was selected for analysis in each participant.

3. RESULTS

Thirty-two patients participated in the study; 15 were in the study group, and 17 were in the control group. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of sex and age (p=0.49 and p= 0.52, respectively) or other clinical characteristics (Table 1). In the diabetes group, the mean diabetes duration was 6.63 years, and the mean HbA1C level was 7.6%. There was no statistical difference in FMD between the DM and control group, despite the DM group having higher mean FMD (6.64 vs 5.67, p= 0.47, respectively). This lack of significance may be attributed to the higher standard deviation in the DM group (3.69 vs 2.67, respectively). Of the retinal and choroidal vascu- larization parameters, CVI-C and perifoveal CVI-P were significantly reduced in the study group compared to the control group (32.56 vs. 47.17 and 53.08 vs. 59.34, respectively) (Table 2 and Fig. 1).

FMD correlated with clinical characteristics, showing a negative correlation with age in the general population and the control group (r=-0.43, p= 0.01; r=-0.51, p=0.04, respectively). In the diabetic group, FMD was also negatively correlated to HT (r=-0.57, p=0.03). When examining the correlation between FMD and vascu- larisation parameters, a positive correlation was found with the SCP-P and CVI-P in the control group (r=0.57, p=0.02; r=0.58, p=0.01, respectively). Additionally, a positive correlation between FMD and DCP-P was observed in the study group, the control group, and the general population (r=0.58, p=0.04; r=0.86, p<0.001; r=0.68, p<0.001, respectively) (Table 3).

Table 1.
Clinical characteristics of the study population.
Parameter DM SD Control SD p Total SD
Age (years) 58.20 11.97 55.06 15.07 0.52 56.53 13.58
Female sex (%) 7(46.67) - 10(58.82) - 0.49 17 (53.13) -
SQ 8.27 1.16 8.18 0.88 0.51 8.22 1.01
BCVA 0.94 0.12 0.97 0.10 0.30 0.95 0.11
Intraocular pressure (mmHg) 16.33 2.23 16.24 2.93 0.92 16.28 2.58
Axial length (mm) 23.57 0.84 23.39 0.92 0.60 23.48 0.87
Systolic BP (mmHg) 137.60 23.42 138.94 19.25 0.86 138.31 20.96
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 83.87 12.36 88.63 11.93 0.36 86.32 12.17
Hypertension (%) 9(60) - 12(70.59) - 0.53 - -
Diabetes duration (years) 6.63 6.72 - - - - -
HbA1C (%) 7.60 1.52 - - - - -
Note: DM, diabetes mellitus type 2; SD, standard deviation; SQ, scan quality; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; BP, blood pressure.
Table 2.
Comparison of vascularization parameters.
Parameter DM SD Control SD p Total SD
FMD (%) 6.64 3.69 5.67 2.67 0.47 6.13 3.17
SCP-C 20.73 5.39 19.12 5.60 0.41 19.88 5.48
SCP-P 48.42 2.95 49.19 2.78 0.51 48.83 2.84
DCP-C 34.17 6.58 31.73 9.77 0.52 33.00 8.16
DCP-P 52.81 3.81 52.36 3.69 1.00 52.60 3.68
CT-C (μm) 274.90 17.69 267.07 23.31 0.31 270.61 21.00
CT-P (μm) 312.06 12.15 312.00 12.32 0.95 312.03 12.04
CVI-C 32.56 8.89 47.17 8.66 0.00 40.32 11.37
CVI-P 53.08 4.34 59.34 3.12 0.00 56.41 4.85
Note: DM, diabetes mellitus type 2; SD, standard deviation; SCP, superficial capillary plexus vascular density; DCP, deep capillary plexus vascular density; CT, choroidal thickness; CVI, choroidal vascularity index; -C, central; -P, perifoveal.
Fig. (1).

Comparison of vascularization parameters.
*, p<0.05; DM, diabetes mellitus type 2; SCP, superficial capillary plexus vascular density; DCP, deep capillary plexus vascular density; CT, choroidal thickness; CVI, choroidal vascularity index; -C, central; -P, perifoveal.

Table 3.
Flow-mediated vasodilatation correlation analysis.
Parameter DM Control Total
Age -0.43 -0.51* -0.43*
Male sex 0.25 -0.15 0.08
Intraocular pressure 0.32 0.16 0.23
Axial length 0.43 0.06 0.23
Systolic BP -0.21 0.42 0.11
Diastolic BP 0.04 0.19 0.09
Hypertension -0.57* 0.05 -0.26
SCP-C -0.11 -0.37 -0.21
SCP-P 0.14 0.57* 0.32
DCP-C -0.16 -0.30 -0.23
DCP-P 0.58* 0.86* 0.68*
CT-C 0.00 -0.38 -0.20
CT-P -0.33 -0.13 -0.19
CVI-C 0.06 0.00 -0.04
CVI-P 0.23 0.58* 0.21
Note: *, p<0.05; DM, diabetes mellitus type 2; BP, blood pressure; SCP, superficial capillary plexus vascular density; DCP, deep capillary plexus vascular density; CT, choroidal thickness; CVI, choroidal vascularity index; -C, central; -P, perifoveal.
Table 4.
Univariate and multivariate flow-mediated vasodilatation linear regression results.
Univariate Multivariate
Parameter Beta p CI 95% Beta p CI 95%
Age -0.38 0.03 (-0.73, -0.04) -0.18 0.38 (-0.59, 0.24)
Male sex -0.04 0.81 (-0.42, 0.33) 0.04 0.81 (-0.32, 0.40)
Group (1-DM) 0.16 0.40 (-0.21, 0.52) - - -
Intraocular pressure 0.19 0.29 (-0.17, 0.56) - - -
Axial length 0.20 0.31 (-0.19, 0.58) - - -
Systolic BP -0.03 0.87 (-0.40, 0.34) - - -
Diastolic BP -0.06 0.73 (-0.44, 0.31) - - -
Hypertension -0.33 0.06 (-0.68, 0.02) -0.40 0.03 (-0.75, -0.05)
Diabetes duration 0.14 0.64 (-0.51, 0.80) - - -
HbA1C -0.08 0.74 (-0.54, 0.39) - - -
SCP-C -0.21 0.24 (-0.58, 0.15) - - -
SCP-P* 0.36 0.04 (0.01, 0.71) - - -
DCP-C -0.14 0.51 (-0.59, 0.30) - - -
DCP-P 0.57 0.00 (0.19, 0.94) 0.47 0.03 (0.06, 0.88)
CT-C -0.24 0.20 (-0.61, 0.13) - - -
CT-P -0.22 0.25 (-0.59, 0.16) - - -
CVI-C -0.18 0.33 (-0.54, 0.19) - - -
CVI-P 0.14 0.46 (-0.23, 0.51) - - -
Note: DM, diabetes mellitus type 2; CI, 95% confidence interval; BP, blood pressure; SCP, superficial capillary plexus vascular density; DCP, deep capillary plexus vascular density; CT, choroidal thickness; CVI, choroidal vascularity index; -C, central; -P, perifoveal. * SCP-P showed collinearity with DCP-P; therefore, SCP-P was not included in the multivariate model.

In the univariate regression analysis, age, SCP-P, and DCP-P were found to significantly influence FMD (b=-0.38, b=0.36, and b=0.57, respectively). Parameters with a p-value lower than 0.1, plus age and sex, were included in the multivariate analysis. Due to the collinearity of DCP-P and SCP-P, it was decided to omit the latter from the multivariate analysis. In the final model, FMD was found to be dependent on the presence of HT (b=-0.4) and DCP-P (b=0.47) (Table 4).

4. DISCUSSION

In this study, in diabetic patients and healthy population, FMD was found to be significantly positively correlated to DCP. Our findings also indicated that FMD was influenced negatively by age and hypertension. Additionally, after adjusting for age and sex, FMD decreased with the presence of hypertension and lower perifoveal DCP. In our studied population, only CVI was significantly lower in diabetic patients than in healthy controls.

In 2023, Heiss et al. published FMD reference values for healthy individuals. Their meta-analysis reported a mean FMD of 6.4%, which was similar to the 6.13% obtained in our study population, containing DM patients and healthy controls. Age significantly influenced the reduction in FMD, which was consistent with our findings. A high heterogeneity was observed between studies despite similar methodologies being used [14]. The association of FMD with hypertension has been previously reported, as HT impairs vascular endothelial function, which influences the degree of arterial vasodilation [15, 16]. Importantly, we did not observe a significant difference in FMD values between the diabetic and healthy groups. It may be explained by the fact that patients in the DM group did not have diabetic complications, and their mean HbA1C level was not significantly elevated (7.6%), so the impairment of endothelial function may not have been significant. It is also possible that this relationship would change in a larger study population. FMD is increasingly recognized for its value not only as a measure of endothelial function but also as a potential predictor of cardiovascular events. Numerous studies have demons- trated that impaired FMD is associated with an elevated risk of atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease, suggesting its utility as a non-invasive tool for early detection of cardiovascular dysfunction [17-19]. The ability to track improvements in FMD following lifestyle or pharmacological interventions makes it a useful metric in both clinical and research settings. However, while FMD has predictive value, it is important to acknowledge that variability in measurement and patient-specific factors can affect its reliability as a universal predictor of cardiovascular outcomes [20-22].

CVI was significantly reduced in the DM group compared to the control group, both in the central and perifoveal regions. This finding aligned with previous studies reporting reduced CVI in patients with diabetes, even in the absence of visible changes in the eye fundus [23, 24]. We did not observe a difference in SCP and DCP, likely due to the small sample sizes, as previous studies have reported reductions in these parameters in diabetic patients [25, 26].

FMD was positively correlated with DCP-P in both study groups and with SCP-P and CVI-P, but only in the control group. This is the first study to observe these correlations, as the relationship among FMD and SCP, DCP, and CVI, to the best of our knowledge, has not been studied in a similar population. Additionally, in the regression analysis, DCP-P emerged as a sex and age-independent factor positively affecting FMD. It is worth mentioning that SCP-P also positively influenced FMD in the univariate analysis and exhibited collinearity with DCP-P. The higher vessel density in the retinal plexuses of patients with higher FMD indicated that endothelial status in the large circulation may be translated to micro- circulation. The relationship between FMD and densities of retinal plexuses has been previously studied in post-COVID-19 patients, but no correlation among macular SCP, DCP, and FMD has been found [27].

Diabetes results in impaired vascular endothelial function, especially in patients with long-term disease. It may be caused by a reduction in nitric oxide (NO) production [28]. NO is a crucial molecule for vasodilation, and its deficiency leads to a decrease in FMD. Lower NO concentration can cause the constriction of arterioles and a subsequent reduction in capillary density. The observed correlation among FMD, SCP, and CVI exclusively in the healthy cohort indicates that endothelial function is dysregulated in individuals with diabetes. The association of FMD with DCP may persist in the diabetic population as this vascular bed is less susceptible to ischemic changes than SCP [29].

Vascular endothelial status, as expressed by FMD, has been studied in various ophthalmic conditions. Bojic et al. demonstrated lower brachial FMD in patients with glaucoma compared to a healthy control group [30]. Yao et al. observed reduced FMD in patients with non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. However, this finding was not confirmed by Ma et al. when comparing with a hypertensive group [31, 32]. FMD was also found to be reduced in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion compared to both healthy and hypertensive groups [33]. Additionally, some authors have suggested a link between endothelial dysfunction and the pathophysiology of wet age-related macular degeneration [12].

The findings of our study suggest that eye micro- circulatory status is associated with vascular endothelial function in systemic circulation. However, further investigations involving larger cohorts are warranted to validate this relationship and identify parameters that can aid in predicting cardiovascular risk based on retinal and choroidal parameters.

Our study has several noteworthy limitations. Firstly, edge tracking software was not used in the calculation of FMD, which may have posed a risk of less accurate capture of maximum arterial diastole. Additionally, the study did not encompass a large cohort, potentially resulting in undetected relationships. Finally, despite statistical insignificance, the control group contained more females.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to report the association of retinal capillary plexus density parameters with peripheral vascular endothelial function expressed by FMD in a healthy population and type 2 diabetes. Higher retinal vascular density, especially in the deep capillary plexus, was found to be associated with higher FMD. This relationship may, in the future, be used to identify additional ocular indicators of cardiovascular function.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

A.M.: collected the data; J.P.-D.: carried out the data analysis or interpretation of the results; M.M.-H.: contributed to the concept or design of the study.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

FMD = Flow-mediated Vasodilatation
CVI = Choroidal Vascularity Index
OCTA = Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
NO = Nitric Oxide
CT = Choroidal Thickness
LA = Luminal Area
TCA = Total Choroidal Area
CVI = Choroidal Vascularity Index

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Wroclaw Medical University, Poland (KB-510/2022).

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

All human research procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee responsible for human experimentation (institutional and national), and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data sets used and/or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author [A.M.] upon request.

STANDARDS OF REPORTING

STROBE guidelines were followed.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

1
Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, et al. Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045. Ophthalmology 2021; 128(11): 1580-91.
2
Rajendran P, Rengarajan T, Thangavel J, et al. The vascular endothelium and human diseases. Int J Biol Sci 2013; 9(10): 1057-69.
3
Gui F, You Z, Fu S, Wu H, Zhang Y. Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetic Retinopathy. Front Endocrinol 2020; 11: 591.
4
Scuderi L, Fragiotta S, Di Pippo M, Abdolrahimzadeh S. The role of diabetic choroidopathy in the pathogenesis and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24(12): 10167.
5
Kur J, Newman EA, Chan-Ling T. Cellular and physiological mechanisms underlying blood flow regulation in the retina and choroid in health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 2012; 31(5): 377-406.
6
Agrawal R, Gupta P, Tan KA, Cheung CMG, Wong TY, Cheng CY. Choroidal vascularity index as a measure of vascular status of the choroid: Measurements in healthy eyes from a population-based study. Sci Rep 2016; 6(1): 21090.
7
Mućka S, Miodońska M, Jakubiak GK, Starzak M, Cieślar G, Stanek A. Endothelial function assessment by flow-mediated dilation method: A valuable tool in the evaluation of the cardiovascular system. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(18): 11242.
8
Inaba Y, Chen JA, Bergmann SR. Prediction of future cardiovascular outcomes by flow-mediated vasodilatation of brachial artery: A meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 26(6): 631-40.
9
Schmetterer L, Polak K. Role of nitric oxide in the control of ocular blood flow. Prog Retin Eye Res 2001; 20(6): 823-47.
10
Al-Fiadh AH, Wong TY, Kawasaki R, et al. Usefulness of retinal microvascular endothelial dysfunction as a predictor of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2015; 115(5): 609-13.
11
Sogawa K, Nagaoka T, Tanano I, et al. Association between diabetic retinopathy and flow-mediated vasodilation in type 2 DM. Curr Eye Res 2012; 37(5): 446-51.
12
Arifoglu HB, Karatepe Hashas AS, Atas M, Sarli B, Ozkose A, Demircan S. Systemic endothelial function in cases with wet-type age-related macular degeneration. Aging Clin Exp Res 2016; 28(5): 853-6.
13
Kramer CK, Rodrigues TC, Canani LH, Gross JL, Azevedo MJ. Diabetic retinopathy predicts all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in both type 1 and 2 diabetes: Meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetes Care 2011; 34(5): 1238-44.
14
Heiss C, Rodriguez-Mateos A, Bapir M, Skene SS, Sies H, Kelm M. Flow-mediated dilation reference values for evaluation of endothelial function and cardiovascular health. Cardiovasc Res 2023; 119(1): 283-93.
15
Ghiadoni L, Huang Y, Magagna A, Buralli S, Taddei S, Salvetti A. Effect of acute blood pressure reduction on endothelial function in the brachial artery of patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens 2001; 19(3 Pt 2): 547-51.
16
Gallo G, Volpe M, Savoia C. Endothelial dysfunction in hypertension: Current concepts and clinical implications. Front Med 2022; 8: 798958.
17
Peters SAE, den Ruijter HM, Bots ML. The incremental value of brachial flow-mediated dilation measurements in risk stratification for incident cardiovascular events: A systematic review. Ann Med 2012; 44(4): 305-12.
18
Yeboah J, Folsom AR, Burke GL, et al. Predictive value of brachial flow-mediated dilation for incident cardiovascular events in a population-based study: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circulation 2009; 120(6): 502-9.
19
Matsuzawa Y, Kwon TG, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Prognostic value of flow‐mediated vasodilation in brachial artery and fingertip artery for cardiovascular events: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4(11): e002270.
20
Tomiyama H, Saisu T, Yamashina A. Measurement of flow-mediated vasodilatation. Int Heart J 2017; 58(2): 158-62.
21
Hardie KL, Kinlay S, Hardy DB, Wlodarczyk J, Silberberg JS, Fletcher PJ. Reproducibility of brachial ultrasonography and flow‐mediated dilatation (FMD) for assessing endothelial function. Aust N Z J Med 1997; 27(6): 649-52.
22
De Roos NM, Bots ML, Schouten EG, Katan MB. Within-subject variability of flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery in healthy men and women: implications for experimental studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29(3): 401-6.
23
Foo VHX, Gupta P, Nguyen QD, Chong CCY, Agrawal R, Cheng CY. Decrease in Choroidal Vascularity Index of Haller's layer in diabetic eyes precedes retinopathy. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020; 8(1): e001295.
24
Kim M, Ha MJ, Choi SY, Park YH. Choroidal vascularity index in type-2 diabetes analyzed by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 70.
25
Zeng Y, Cao D, Yu H, et al. Early retinal neurovascular impairment in patients with diabetes without clinically detectable retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2019; 103(12): 1747-52.
26
Dimitrova G, Chihara E, Takahashi H, Amano H. Author Response: Quantitative Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Patients With Diabetes Without Diabetic Retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58(3): 1767.
27
Savastano MC, Santoro L, Crincoli E, et al. Radial peripapillary capillary plexus perfusion and endothelial dysfunction in early post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vision 2022; 6(2): 26.
28
Tessari P, Cecchet D, Cosma A, et al. Nitric oxide synthesis is reduced in subjects with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Diabetes 2010; 59(9): 2152-9.
29
Falavarjani KG, Mirshahi R, Riazi-Esfahani H, et al. Spatial distribution of diabetic capillary non‐perfusion. Microcirculation 2021; 28(7): e12719.
30
Bojic L, Rogosic V, Markovic D, Rogosic LV, Glavas D. Brachial flow—mediated dilation and carotid intima—media thickness in glaucoma patients. BMC Ophthalmol 2022; 22(1): 275.
31
Ma CH, Dai T-T, Chen T-T, Zhu W-H, Zhu WH. Risk factors of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy and central retinal artery occlusion. Int J Ophthalmol 2024; 17(5): 869-76.
32
Yao F, Wan P, Su Y, Liao R, Zhu W. Impaired systemic vascular endothelial function in patients with non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016; 254(5): 977-81.
33
Tanano I, Nagaoka T, Sogawa K, et al. Impaired systemic vascular endothelial function in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion. Curr Eye Res 2013; 38(1): 114-8.