Conventional Versus Accelerated Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A Comparison of Visual, Refractive, Topographic and Biomechanical Outcomes



Jyh Haur Woo1, Jayant Venkatramani Iyer1, Li Lim2, 3, *, M Htoon Hla3, Jodhbir S Mehta2, 3, Cordelia ML Chan2, Donald TH Tan2, 3
1 General Cataract and Comprehensive Ophthalmology, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore
2 Corneal and External Eye Disease Service, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore
3 Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS, Singapore, Singapore


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
2
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 556
Abstract HTML Views: 382
PDF Downloads: 505
ePub Downloads: 289
Total Views/Downloads: 1732
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 351
Abstract HTML Views: 222
PDF Downloads: 203
ePub Downloads: 90
Total Views/Downloads: 866



© 2017 Woo et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751, Singapore; Tel: +6562277255; Fax: +6562277290; E-mail: lim.li@singhealth.com.sg


Abstract

Objective:

The aim was to compare the visual, refractive, topographic and biomechanical outcomes in patients with progressive keratoconus treated with either conventional or accelerated crosslinking at one year follow up.

Methods:

It is a prospective, non-randomised interventional study of 76 patients who underwent conventional (CXL; 3mW/cm2 for 30 minutes) or accelerated cross linking (KXL; 30mW/cm2 for 4 minutes) for progressive keratoconus. Baseline and postoperative visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal topography, pachymetry, endothelial cell density and biomechanical parameters of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor were evaluated and compared.

Results:

The 2 groups were comparable in terms of uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity and spherical equivalent. Both groups showed no significant increase in K1, K2 and Kmean from baseline at 12 months. There was also no difference between the CXL and KXL group for postoperative corneal topography as well as central and minimal pachymetry up to 12 months. There was a significant increase in both corneal hysteresis (0.62mm Hg, P=0.04) and corneal resistance factor (0.91mm Hg, P=0.003) in the KXL group at 12 months but not in the CXL group. There was no significant endothelial cell loss throughout follow up in both the groups.

Conclusion:

We have established comparability of the 2 protocols in stabilizing the progression of keratoconus. Our findings also suggested an added biomechanical advantage of accelerated crosslinking at 1 year follow up.

Keywords: Cross linking, Keratoconus, Corneal biomechanics, Collagen, Topographic, Biomechanical outcomes.