Submit Abstract OnlineSubmit Issue ProposalBecome an Editorial Board MemberBecome a ReviewerBecome an Executive Guest EditorBecome a Section Editor

Aims and Scope

The Open Ophthalmology Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest-edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in ophthalmology, including ophthalmological therapies, devices, and surgical techniques used for the treatment of eye diseases and refractive errors.


The Open Ophthalmology Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field, including physiological optics, optometry, and reconstructive surgery. The scope of the journal also covers studies related to the anatomy and function of the cornea and retina. Its emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and making them freely available to researchers worldwide.


Recent Articles

Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium after Myopic Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) with Accelerated Cross-Linking (CXL) in Diabetic Patients

Mohamed Salah El-Din Mahmoud, Ebtesam E. Hassan, Ahmed S. Abdelhalim

Purpose:

To study the effect of LASIK with accelerated CXL on corneal endothelium in myopic diabetic patients.

Methods:

A prospective comparative interventional case series study on 120 eyes of 60 myopic patients treated with LASIK with accelerated CXL. They were divided into two groups; group A included 60 eyes of diabetic patients, group B included 60 eyes of non-diabetic patients. Corneal endothelium was evaluated by specular microscope preoperatively and after 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results:

The endothelial cells density (ECD) showed statistically significant changes after 3 and 6 months postoperatively (p-value <0.001) in group A while group B showed statistically significant changes after 3 months without significant change after 6 months (p-value= 0.103), both groups had improved to near preoperative levels, with no significant differences between them at the end of 6 months follow-up (p-value = 0.219). Regarding pleomorphism, there was a significant change in group A during 6 months follow-up (p-value <0.001) with no significant change in group B (p-value= 0.884), and in comparing both groups, there was a significant change at the end of 6 months follow-up (p-value <0.001). Regarding polymegathism, there was a significant change in group A during 6 months follow-up (p-value <0.001) with no significant change in group B after 3 (p-value= 0.178) and 6 (p-value= 0.866) months follow-up, and in comparing both groups, there was a significant change at the end of 6 months follow-up (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion:

LASIK with accelerated CXL is safe on corneal endothelium in diabetic myopic patients but needs to follow up for a long period.

December 31, 2021
READ MORE

Articles

Editor's Choice

Femtosecond Laser-assisted Lens Surgery with Low-energy Pulse versus Conventional Phacoemulsification for Presbyopia Correction: An Intraindividual Study

Ramiro M. P. C. Salgado, Paulo F. A. A. S. Torres, António A. P. Marinho

Background:

Lens surgery with multifocal IOL implantation for presbyopia correction is performed by femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery or conventional phacoemulsification.

Objective:

To compare the clinical results of femtosecond laser-assisted with low-energy pulse conventional phacoemulsification lens surgery for presbyopia correction intraindividually.

Methods:

Charts from patients who underwent Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE) for presbyopia correction in a single center, with Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Lens Surgery (FLALS) in one eye and Conventional Phacoemulsification (CP) in the other, were retrospectively reviewed. All eyes had the same multifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL) implanted. The clinical outcomes and the results of the level of satisfaction questionnaire were compared between the two groups according to the technique employed (FLALS vs. CP) for a period of up to four years. Stability, efficacy and safety indices were also assessed.

Results:

This study comprised a total of 56 eyes of 28 patients randomly assigned FLALS in one eye and CP in the other. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two techniques regarding postoperative visual acuities, duration of surgical procedure, efficacy or safety indexes (p>0.05). Refraction was stable in all FLALS eyes, whereas a change occurred in 2 eyes (7.1%) operated with CP upon 6 months postoperatively, but without statistical significance (p˃0.05). Satisfaction was slightly better with FLALS but not statistically significant (p=0.134). No immediate myosis or other adverse events after the femtosecond laser were registered.

Conclusion:

The parameters assessed showed no significant differences between the two techniques, in spite of a difference of refraction stability upon 6 months postoperatively.

March 17, 2021
READ MORE

Other Post

Quick Links

Ensuring Content IntegrityFAQsBoard Recruitment WorkflowGuidelines for Guest EditorsPublication Cycle Process FlowQuick Track OptionOpen Access FundingPublication FeeReviewers GuidelinesPeer Review WorkflowCopyediting ServicesEditorial PoliciesSelf Archiving PoliciesPublishing Ethics and Rectitude

Indexing Agencies

READ MORE